Absolutely not a fan of Project Veritas and its rogue, lawless, strange ways, but I do have to say they may have a point if the documents were leaked by the FBI.

Imagine if a law enforcement agency carrying out a lawful search in support of a possible criminal prosecution, was then able to circumvent attorney/client privilege, by simply leaking the documents to a news organization who can in turn claim that freedom of the press trumps attorney/client privilege, thereby destroying it. It's especially icky when, as in this case, the attorney/client privilege seems to related to ...criminal prosecution. And while you're right that the attorney/client privilege isn't spelled out in the constitution, it's arguably at least related to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. So I don't know. I think Project Veritas sucks, I think getting a personal diary of a President's child sucks, I think they manipulate facts and I feel icky even sort of coming to their defense. But there is a lot of tail wagging the dog here if a law enforcement agency can have a news organization destroy attorney/client privilege.

It would feel different if the leak came from within Project Veritas, because then arguably the attorney/client privilege had been waived.

But it's something we'll never know. Fascinating piece.

--

--

Federal attorney, writing thought crimes on Medium. To connect: Adeline.Dimond@gmail.com

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Adeline Dimond

Adeline Dimond

Federal attorney, writing thought crimes on Medium. To connect: Adeline.Dimond@gmail.com

More from Medium

Don’t You Think I’m Looking Older?

Maybe White Supremacists Should Lighten Up

My Wife Has More Empathy Than I Do

Did You Just Say That As A Teacher I’m Not Allowed To Talk About Being Gay?!